Dataram singh vs. state of u.p. and another
WebFeb 6, 2024 · On 13th January, 2016 the complainant lodged a First Information Report (FIR) No. 16 of 2016 at Police Station Sahjanawa, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, alleging … WebMar 24, 2024 · State of U.P., (2024) 3 SCC 52] Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Ss. 28, 34, 28-A and 18 — Non-award of interest under Ss. 28 or 34 — Appropriate remedy: Said dispute, held, can be raised only by taking recourse to Art. 226 of the Constitution. Reference under S. 18 or S. 28-A is not an alternative remedy available for non-award of …
Dataram singh vs. state of u.p. and another
Did you know?
http://jkja.nic.in/archives/August_2024.pdf WebHaving heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, (2024) 3 SCC 22, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
WebJul 1, 2024 · Considering the material/evidence brought on record, the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties as well as the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2024) 3 SCC 22, let the applicant involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond … WebIndian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
WebGet free access to the complete judgment in Dataram Singh v. State Of U.P. on CaseMine. WebConsidering the material/evidence brought on record, the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties as well as the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2024) 3 SCC 22, let the applicant involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two ...
Web35. In the case of Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2024) 3 SCC 22, the Hon'ble Supreme Court was pleased to reiterate the law of bail in the following words:-- "2. A fundamental postulate of criminal jurisprudence is the presumption of innocence, meaning thereby that a person is believed to be innocent until found guilty.
WebBAIL APPLICATION No. - 11593 of 2024 Applicant :- Jitendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Narayan Singh (Kushwaha) Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J. Heard Sri Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA-I, appearing for the State and perused the material brought ... orchid a monthWebDataram Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & ANR. [Criminal Appeal No.227 /2024 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 151 of 2024] Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. A … orchid absolute essential oilWebFeb 8, 2024 · Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence on record regarding complicity of the accused, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2024) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the … ipython clear consoleWeb(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (CRL.) NO. 151 OF 2024) Dataram Singh …Appellant Versus State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. …Respondents J U D G M E N T Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. A fundamental postulate of criminal jurisprudence is the presumption of innocence, meaning thereby that a person is believed to be innocent until found guilty. ipython clearWebHaving considered the material on record, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2024) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released ... ipython clear console from script cksWebFeb 6, 2024 · Dataram Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh1 (ii) Sri Somappa @ Swamy vs. State of Karnataka2 (iii) Jayaram @ Appu v. The State of Karnataka3.../2024 DD 02.03.2024 Crl.P.No.7660/2024 7. In Dataram Singhs case referred to supra the offences involved were one under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 506 of IPC. ipython change python versionWebKeeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence on record regarding complicity of the accused, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2024)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the ... ipython clear display